Take a neat concept (programmers answering programmers), put devotion and work on it so that it becomes StackOverflow.com. Make sure credit goes where it is due and that helping out people turns into something that can help you being helped later on.
And for some reason, some soulless ruleless content-rippers that dub themselves "weask.us" will scavenge the net with their bot, present the "question/answers" as if they did all the job, not giving the slightest hint that the content comes from another source. This is the most disgusting thing I've come across since ... Windows ME. No, it's even worse than that.
A wise friend once taught me "there's no big Sauron. There's no epicentre of evil we can fight". True. But sure, there isn't any limit to the amount of dishonesty and dishonour some sort of people can be made of.
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Lamers don't die ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
- + 
Vote for your favourite post
2 comments:
Je n'ai évidemment compris qu'une partie de ton billet... C'est à dire que je ne sais pas vraiment "qui s'est fait "lamer""...
Bin disons que c'est un peu comme si quelqu'un scannait Trackers@work pour récupérer les mp3 des projets, et les proposait sur un site "apparemment gratuit", mais saturé de publicités à 2 balle et faisait surtout bien attention d'avoir un haut ranking.
Ici, c'est stackoverflow (tu préfèreras sans doute sa 'filiale' ServerFault) qui s'est fait repomper son contenu par les connards de chez weask, sans qu'il n'y ait aucune mention des auteurs (les programmeurs qui ont posé les questions) ni des responsables (les gestionnaires du site stackoverflow qui permettent de partager/trier/voter sur les questions-réponses).
Post a Comment